Investigators Open Criminal Case Against Navalny Brothers
Published: December 14, 2012 (Issue # 1739)
Vladimir Andreyev / For SPT
Alexei Navalny speaking at an anti-Kremlin protest on Prospekt Akademika Sakharova last December.
MOSCOW – Investigators opened a criminal case Friday against prominent Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny, his brother Oleg and a group of unspecified others on charges of large-scale corruption and money laundering.
The criminal case is the latest in a string of investigations launched against Navalny, an anti-corruption blogger and member of the opposition’s recently formed Coordination Council, who rose to prominence on the back of the yearlong protest movement against President Vladimir Putin’s rule.
Investigators, who allege that Navalny and associates stole more than 55 million rubles ($1.8 million), over 19 million rubles of which were laundered via a company owned by Navalny’s parents, opened the case on the eve of an unsanctioned protest scheduled for Saturday that Navalny is expected to attend.
If charged and convicted, the Navalnys face up to 10 years in prison and a hefty fine.
Navalny, who was in a meeting of Aeroflot’s audit committee when investigators announced the case against him, implied on Twitter that the case was another attempt to silence him by applying pressure on his family.
“As I far as I understand, it’s not enough for them to pressure me. Now they’ve started on my family as well,” said Navalny, who sits on the board of directors of the national flag carrier.
“I’ve read the Investigative Committee statement. … It’s complete rubbish,” he said, adding that investigators searched the home of his parents and brother’s place of work in the early afternoon.
Explaining the ongoing investigation, the Investigative Committee said on its official website that the Navalnys’ corrupt scheme was hatched in spring 2008, when Oleg Navalny, then a manager at Russian Post, convinced a large commercial firm backed by foreign capital to sign a contract to transport post with a company founded by Alexei Navalny but registered in the name of an unidentified acquaintance.
The statement said that the company Navalny founded, called Main Subscription Agency, then offered the large commercial firm freight services at an inflated price and outsourced the services to a separate transportation company managed by another unidentified acquaintance of Oleg Navalny.
According to investigators, the scheme ran from August 2008 to May 2011, during which time Main Subscription Agency was paid for transporting post between Yaroslavl and Moscow. In a further twist, investigators said that the commercial firm significantly overpaid the company allegedly controlled by the Navalny brothers.
Through this elaborate ruse, investigators said the Navalny brothers pocketed over 55 million rubles, the bulk of which was spent on “their own needs” and the rest of which was transferred to the Kobyakovo Willow-Weaving Factory, a Moscow region business owned by Navalny’s parents, to pay for rent and raw materials.
In August, investigators and Federal Security Service officers raided Navalny’s parents’ willow-weaving factory.
At the time, Navalny suspected that they were looking for evidence implicating him in the theft of timber products from the KirovLes state company, a scam that reportedly cost the regional government 16 million rubles. Navalny was working as an adviser to Kirov region Governor Nikita Belykh at the time the theft was supposed to have taken place.
The KirovLes investigation was later dropped after law enforcement officials found that Navalny had not committed any violations. The regional investigator who oversaw the inquiry, Major-General Alexander Panov, was reportedly fired in early December after a dressing-down by his boss, Investigative Committee chief Alexander Bastrykin.
“You have a man named Navalny. You had a criminal case against him and you stopped it on the quiet,” Bastrykin said while addressing Panov in November.
Belykh later denied that Panov’s firing had anything to do with the Navalny case and said Panov resigned due to family reasons. He didn’t elaborate further.
On Friday, investigators said they were running additional checks to determine the Navalnys’ role in the elaborate corruption case announced that morning.
It was not immediately clear whether Navalny would be summoned for questioning. In June, Navalny was summoned to the Investigative Committee on the same day as a March of Millions protest, preventing him from addressing supporters.