Pakistani student Abid Naseer was plotting a “devastating” bomb attack in Manchester, which could have been as deadly as the 7/7 attacks in London, according to police.
Naseer, 28, was
convicted in a New York court of plotting attacks on both the NYC
subway system and a shopping center in Manchester.
Greater Manchester Police’s chief investigating officer on the
case, Detective Superintendent Mark Smith, said the attacks were
“as big a plot as we’ve seen in the UK.”
“The scale of the intended attack, the number of casualties
that I think we would have seen in Manchester, would have been
comparable to the 7/7 attack,” he told Sky News.
He revealed that emails Naseer, a member of Al-Qaida, sent from a
Manchester internet cafe to a suspected handler in Pakistan about
an impending wedding were actually coded details of the attack.
They had targeted the Arndale shopping center in Manchester.
His comments come as police chiefs have questioned why Naseer
wasn’t prosecuted in the UK after planning “another
9/11” on British streets.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has been criticized for
failing to charge him when he was arrested in Manchester in 2009.
Police had submitted a file to the CPS, but he didn’t face
prosecution as there was insufficient evidence, the CPS claims.
The CPS also failed to deport Naseer, and allowed the Pakistani
national back on the streets.
Later he was issued with a control order and was taken back into
custody while US authorities began extradition proceedings. He
was deported to the US in January 2013.
Retired Detective Chief Inspector Allan Donoghue said the CPS was
wrong not to charge Naseer with planning a terrorist attack and
said lives have been put at risk by their failure to prosecute
him in the UK.
As reported by ITV, Tony Lloyd, police and crime commissioner for
Greater Manchester, said: “The reality is that, had the
Americans not acted, a dangerous man who was intent on causing
death and destruction here could potentially still be walking our
“This is deeply worrying and I will be raising this issue
with the home secretary because we need real assurances that
whatever went wrong here is never repeated. The public will want
to know why he wasn’t brought to trial here.”
A CPS spokeswoman said: “The evidence in our possession in
relation to Abid Naseer, which would have been admissible in a
criminal court, was very limited.
“Crucially, there was no evidence of training, research or
the purchasing of explosives.
“We had no evidence of an agreement between Abid Naseer and
others which would have supported a charge of conspiracy in this