Syrian president Bashar Assad has stated that he is awaiting concrete indications that the US really wants to begin dialogue aimed at resolving the Syrian conflict, after Secretary of State John Kerry declared US readiness for such talks.
“We are still
listening to the comments, and we have to wait for the actions,
and then we’ll decide,” Assad told Syrian television on
Monday. He welcomed any change of stance that would stop
“logistical, financial and military support to
terrorists” from third parties.
“Any international changes that come about within that
framework are something positive, if they are honest and have an
effect on the ground,” he said.
However, any talks “on the future of the Syrian president…
[are] for the Syrian people and all the declarations from outside
do not concern us,” Assad added.
Political commentator Alaa Ibrahim told RT the Syrian government
understood
that on some level the West would have to negotiate with it but
the question of the subject of the negotiations remains.
READ MORE: Kerry says US wants to negotiate with
Assad… State Dept denies
On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry told CBS that the US
would have to negotiate with the Syrian government.
“We’ll have to negotiate,” Kerry said. “But to get
the Assad regime to negotiate, we’re going to have to make it
clear to him that there is a determination by everybody to seek
that political outcome and change his calculation about
negotiating.”
The State Department though did not appear to support Kerry, with
spokesperson Marie Harf saying on Monday there was “no future
for a brutal dictator like Assad” in Syria and saying the
idea of negotiations was not made in reference to to Assad.
Spokeswoman Jen Psaki also clarified that “there always has been
a need for representatives of the Assad regime to be a part” of
the negotiation process. “It would not be, and would never be
– and it wasn’t what Secretary Kerry was intending to imply –
that that would be Assad himself.”
The US authorities have long been demanding Assad’s unconditional
resignation claiming his power to be illegitimate. Since the
beginning of the conflict, a large part of Syria has been overrun
by the Islamic State (formerly ISIS). The group was reinforced by
dozens of rebel factions, some of which had previously been
supported by Western governments.
But Washington, despite this turn of events, remains committed to
sending more weapons to Syria arming what they call “moderate”
militants who fight against Assad’s government.
However, some specialists compare the potential situation in
Syria with that of Libya after the ousting of Muammar Gaddafi,
stating that it would be better to support Assad given the rise
of the Islamic State and other militants.
READ MORE: Plunge into darkness: 83% of Syrian
electricity wiped out
“It would get even worse in Syria if Assad was dropped, and I
think many American leaders recognize that, but it’s still too
early for Kerry and Obama to say outright that ‘we must – as the
US – send envoys to talk to Assad’s government,” Jonathan
Steele, columnist for the Guardian on International affairs, told
RT.
Last September, the US-led coalition started airstrikes in Syria
as a part of a joint effort to battle ISIS militants in Iraq and
parts of northern Syria. President Assad stressed many times that
strikes are an illegal intervention as they were not authorized
by a UN Security Council resolution and do not respect the
sovereignty of Syria.
Syria has hit the four-year war landmark and there seems to be no
end in sight to people’s suffering, chaos and terror. An
estimated 220,000 people have died since the beginning of the
conflict and millions had to leave their homes. Four out of five
civilians live below the poverty line. New satellite images of
Syria show that over 80 per cent of the country’s lights which
were visible at night have gone out. Half of all children have
not attended school over the past couple of years as about 4,600
of them were damaged or destroyed.